Vaidhyanathan said Facebook’s live video feature has turned into a beast that Facebook can do little about “short of flipping the switch.” Though Facebook has hired more moderators to supplement its machine detection and user reports, “you cannot hire enough people” to police a service with 2.3 billion users. Facebook simply didn’t know about it in time.įacebook’s Sonderby said in Tuesday’s blog post that the company “designated both shootings as terror attacks, meaning that any praise, support and representation of the events” are violations. Indecision didn’t seem to be the case here, though. In some cases, it’s not clear at the outset whether a video or other post violates Facebook’s standards, especially on a service with a range of languages and cultural norms. She calls it “incredibly offensive and inappropriate” to pin responsibility on users subjected to traumatic video. “If they cannot handle the responsibility, then it’s their fault for continuing to provide that service,” said Mary Anne Franks, a law professor at the University of Miami. Nonetheless, they say Facebook cannot deflect responsibility. However, it’s less clear how these systems apply to Facebook’s live streaming.Įxperts say live video poses unique challenges, and complaints about live streaming suicides, murders and beatings regularly come up. The suspect in an attack on mosques in New Zealand live streamed himself getting ready, going to the mosque and opening fire on worshippers who had gathered for prayers on Friday. The death toll from the mosque shootings rose to 50 after investigators found another body at one of the mosques, said New Zealand's Police Commissioner said on Sunday. The video also outlined how it uses “computer vision” to detect 97 percent of graphic violence before anyone reports it. A New Zealand man who shared a livestream video of the Christchurch mosque attacks has been jailed for 21 months. Those reports are then sent to human reviewers, the company said in a November video. Al Noor mosque was one of two mosques targeted during the Christchurch attack. Facebook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment and questions about its communications with police.įacebook uses artificial intelligence to detect objectionable material, while relying on the public to flag content that violates its standards. The company does have a page titled “ information for law enforcement authorities ,” but it merely outlines procedures for making legal requests for user account records. Users are also told to contact law enforcement if someone is in immediate danger.įacebook also doesn’t appear to post any public information instructing law enforcement how to report dangerous or criminal video. A user who clicks on “report live video” gets a choice of objectionable content types to select from, including violence, bullying and harassment. The Twitter account of the same name was quickly suspended.To report live video, a user must know to click on a small set of three gray dots on the right side of the post. Shooting reaction in New Zealand 'The fact it has happened on the day that was meant to be a huge celebration for New Zealand is just gobsmacking,' 1 News reporter Jacob Johnson told the BBC. The Facebook account that posted the video was no longer available shortly after the shooting. In a lengthy manifesto published online the supposed shooter outlined who he was and why he carried out the massacre at the Christchurch mosque, NZ Herald reported. (AP Photo/Vincent Yu, File) FILE - In this March 16, 2019, file photo, mourners pay their. 8, 2020 into the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings in which 51 Muslim worshippers were slaughtered sheds new light on how the gunman was able to elude detection by authorities as he planned out his attack. Inside the mosque, the gunman's footage showed distinctively patterned green carpet that also matched images tagged on Google Maps as being at the same location.ĭistinctive writing on the gunman's weapons seen in the footage also matched images posted on a Twitter account using the same name and cartoon profile picture as the Facebook Live video. A comprehensive report released Tuesday, Dec. This included the entrance of the mosque, which has a number of distinct features such as a fence, postbox and doorway. The 17-minute video ended as the gunman drove away from the scene at speed.Īgence France-Presse confirmed the video was genuine through a digital investigation that included matching screenshots of the mosque taken from the gunman's footage with multiple images available online showing the same areas. The one-minute 30-second video offers an unnerving first-person view. He then re-entered the mosque to check for survivors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |